 |
The more we work with clients, the more we become convinced that every
business has its own blend of strategy, management infrastructure and
organizational behaviors needed to bring the business to life. We’ve
come to think of this blend as the “operating model,” with three
component gears that drive the business. Only when strategy, management
infrastructure and organizational behaviors are aligned and linked into
a cohesive model can a business really kick into gear.
Your Guide to the Gears
Understanding how operating models work begins with the strategy. It’s
the “North Star” for the business, the one directional constant in an
environment of constant change and uncertainty. In an effective
operating model, strategy combines vision, mission and critical success
factors. It’s not enough, for instance, to say that strategic intent is
to increase shareholder value. Strategy must identify the course to that
goal. It must target particular business opportunities. What holds the
most promise for this business? Is it increased revenue or market share?
Does the strategy call for an acquisition or an IPO?
The management infrastructure clarifies the rules needed for the
business to stay on course. Structure, governance, decision-making,
planning, priority-setting, business processes, and resource allocation
all make up the management infrastructure. They require, however, a
balance between specificity and flexibility in how they are applied.
Consider, for instance, the use of “dead reckoning” as a form of
navigation in sailing. It helps you adjust your course based on your
most recent data, such as speed, direction and time. Most businesses
today require the same flexible, adjust-as- you-go approach to
implementing a strategy. Detailed plans of the past have a short life,
because today’s businesses encounter rapid competitive changes in the
marketplace.
Organizational behaviors explicitly define how people - especially
leaders - need to operate in order to align with a particular business
strategy and management infrastructure. Not only expected behaviors, but
also underlying values and beliefs can guide the alignment of important
human resource systems.
With rewards, protocols, leadership profiles and role specifications
rein- forcing expected behaviors, values and beliefs, everyone’s
performance can contribute to the intended business direction.
Together, these three components answer the essential operational
questions for any business. What? How? And, in what manner? When the
three components of the operating model are fully integrated, a smooth,
powerful rhythm of practice inevitably results. And that rhythm is a
major force behind successful performance.

Stripping the Gears
Our experience working with companies in different industries suggests
that many businesses try to function with an ill-defined operating
model. Or they may tinker with a single gear, often investing a great
deal of money and time. They do not realize that tinkering with a single
gear affects everything. They consistently fail to synchronize the
entire operation. Result? An organization out of whack, limping along
with stripped gears and the following problems:
- Lack of alignment and direction
- Conflicting or competing priorities
- Initiatives begun but not completed
- Unclear roles, responsibilities and authority levels
- Unspoken conflicts about strategic intent among the members of the
senior management group
- Incongruity between what management says and does
- Disconnect between senior management’s view of the business and
the view held in other layers of the organization
So, what causes these conditions? We see companies that base their
strategy on clear thinking and an intensive analysis of the environment.
However, they base their organizational structure on tradition and
incumbent employees, and their organizational behavior on sacred cows
and beliefs, independent of the strategy. They do not carefully align
the “what” with the “how.”
Indeed, they may not know how to produce such alignment. Even a
company that recognizes the need to change may feel overwhelmed by
attempting to fix everything at once. The usual inclination is to talk
about it all, but only fix a piece of it now. It’s easy to understand
why the urge to produce quick and efficient results even if they handle
operations the old way, can be more compelling than taking the time to
align operational activities with the strategic direction. In the long
run, their short cuts cost more and take more time, just the opposite
result of their “quick and efficient” intent.
In a world demanding immediate results, contemporary organizations
place the highest value on action. Thinking and time are seen as
inhibitors to performance, an expense. It takes time and thinking to
design an operating model and really understand the operating
implications of each component. You simply cannot explore those
implications without group discussions and dialogue. It also takes real
commitment to stay on course. Organizational lead- ers must be focused
and tenacious, resisting the lure of the quick fix. They must be willing
to wait for the positive consequences that unquestionably will occur,
though not necessarily overnight.

go to page 2
>> |